Posted 19/8/06
What We Know Council Did...
26 July, 2006 (draft Minutes): Amendments to Call Centre Permit
Permit Approved on 24 May (Minutes) With Amendments Made 26 July
EXTRACT FROM MINUTES, Ordinary Council Meeting – Wednesday, 24 May, 2006
26 July, 2006 (draft minutes): Amendments Made To Call Centre Permit
CLOSURE OF MEETING
9.51 pm. It was moved by Cr Neil seconded by Cr Letchford that the meeting be closed pursuant to Section 89(2)(h)of the Local Government Act 1989 to consider;
3. An item of Urgent of Other Business in relation to the Development of Retail Shops & Offices, Prince Street, Gisborne – Planning permit P206 - 0150
CARRIED
9.52 pm Cr Gyroffy left the meeting and did not return.
9.54 pm Cr Guthrie left the meeting and did not return.
OPENING OF MEETING
10.40 pm It was moved by Cr Letchford seconded by Cr Harvey that the meeting return to open Council and the resolutions of Council be recorded in open Council and the Confidential Report circulated to Councillors be made public.
CARRIED
14.3 DEVELOPMENT OF RETAIL SHOPTS & OFFICES, PRINCE STREET, GISBORNE
File Ref: 4/3635/1200/PA3 P206-0150
Synopsis:
Further to the report and decision at Council's Planning Committee on 12 July 2006 to amend the planning permit conditions, Council has received advice that the conditions still present an unworkable restriction on the operation of the primary activity.
After meeting again with the key tenant and discussions with the applicant, it is suggested that these issues could be resolved with further modifications to the conditions as provided in the attachment.
Officer Comment:
In summary to achieve a mutually acceptable outcome Council needs to be prepared to accept the following:
- Car parking for the retail floor area discounted as follows - 3.7 spaces per 100m2 rather than 8 spaces/100m2 – this rate reduction has been previously applied to other sites in the Gisborne Town Centre. This would require 94 spaces for retail uses on-site and only 76 spaces are currently available.
- For the office component, car parking provided at the rate specified in the Planning Scheme of 3.5 spaces per 100m2 of floor area which requires 210 spaces. Only 163 spaces on-site are proposed
There are a further 50 on-street spaces to be constructed on the western side of Prince Street and the eastern side of Goode Street as shown in plans submitted on 6 July 2006. This equates to a contribution by Council in excess of 1500m2 or $200,000.
In order to meet the total of 304 spaces necessary, the amended approval of Council given on 17 July 2006 proposed a further 16 spaces be provided in the form of a cash contribution. The applicant has accepted this arrangement or the alternative of building further on-street car parking spaces at a site/s and standard acceptable to Council. This latter arrangement is acceptable to the Director, Sustainable Environment & Infrastructure.
Given that the reduction in parking spaces is only for the retail component and not the office space and that the tenant is likely to generate the most substantive turnover in parking within the office area will have dedicated secure parking if it considered that the removal of the cap of 150 staff may be endorsed by Council.
From the most recent discussions with the national tenant, the call centre activities will be most busy in the evenings and weekends. This will not impact on parking substantially given 107 secure parking spaces will be provided for this in the development's basement. However access to Goode Street should be closed between 7pm and 7am to protect the residential amenity of the area.
It is noted that the rate for retail parking prescribed in the planning scheme is accepted as being high for rural and regional centres. In the event that the reduction in the provision of carparking spaces across the town centre leads to a problem in the future, Council will need to consider a special charges scheme to provide additional parking. This is impact on this developers and others in the defined area.
Conclusion:
Given that Council has not applied any reduction to the provision of parking for the office use; and the business which was proposed to have its staff levels capped has the full compliment of parking required in a secure location, the removal of Condition 4 limiting staff numbers is recommended.
It is also suggested that to ensure flexibility and certainty for both Council and the developer as the detailed design phase commences, that Condition 2 be amended to define that the balance of car parking spaces to be provided to achieve a total of 304 spaces being built to accommodate this use may be achieved by payment or construction elsewhere in the surrounding area to Council's satisfaction.
Officer Recommendation:
That Council approve the amended conditions for Permit P206-0150 as follows
- Condition 1 be amended to provide for boom gates on the Goode Street entrances, to limit this to egress between the hours of 7.00 pm and 7.00 am, provision of access from the basement car park to the on-site carpark and a requirement that parking in Goode Street be designed for 60 degree
- Condition 2 be amended to provide for the option to construct the shortfall of parking on other sites to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.
- Condition 4 be deleted.
It was moved by Cr Letchford seconded by Cr Relph that the Officer Recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
Closure of Meeting
The meeting closed at 10.40 pm
EXTRACT FROM MINUTES, Ordinary Council Meeting – Wednesday, 24 May, 2006
Permit Approved on 24 May With Amendments Made On 26 July
It was moved by Cr. Letchford seconded by Cr. Harvey
Major Projects
Formal Motion
It was moved by Cr Gyroffy that the motion now before the meeting be adjourned for a maximum of 2 weeks.
The motion was put and lost.
LOST
The motion before the Council was put and carried.
CARRIED